Best and worst cities for dating
With a score of 66.75, it ranks ahead of Florida (65.09) and New York (64.16). In terms of cities, Sacramento was 44th overall on the “Best & Worst Cities for Singles” list, which surveyed 182 U. 1 overall), Los Angeles (third), San Diego (fifth) and San Jose (34th).
#Valentines Day is coming up, and where you live can affect your relationship status.
Raleigh ranked first in North Carolina this year for the taste of its drinking water.
The city’s water won a taste test at the 97th conference of the North Carolina American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Association.
In today’s world, online dating is war—you never know who’s real or fake, and finger swipes and snap decisions determine fates. Before you resign yourself to a life of cats and knitting, read on.
Whoever said online dating is easy never agonized over the perfect profile photo, tried to write a clever bio, or dodged creepers, scammers, and catfishers.Find out the best states for #singles here: https://t.co/Hw9ifs7FSZ pic.twitter.com/VWLi IBEI2j— Wallet Hub (@wallethub) February 6, 2018 Using 27 indicators to come up with a score, the state ranks No.1 overall in several of them: online-dating participation, restaurants per capita, nature parks and other similar institutions per capita, fitness and recreational facilities per capita and number of attractions.Ann Arbor was the top-rated Michigan city for singles, followed by Lansing and Kalamazoo. ranked first in the rankings, while Elizabethtown/Fort Knox, Ky. Take the rankings with a grain of salt - instead of being salty - as internet rankings aren't always perfect.
Six of the 13 Michigan cities received an "F" ranking. This data comes from American Community Survey data, U.
Charlotte fared even more poorly: It’s second-worst in the country. cities, with 19 percent of residents reporting that they’d encountered a roach.